Labour parks sale shock to cover £18m black hole

The Labour Birmingham City Council plans to sell off even more park land than first thought to cover an £18m black-hole in its budget as financial mismanagement woes continue. Papers presented to next week’s Resources Overview and Scrutiny Committee show that the Council is forecasting an £18m overspend on its budget this year. This comes just months after a damning report from the city’s external auditors raised severe criticisms of its financial management. Part of the response to the overspend contained within the report is to increase the amount of park land the council intends to sell off. There is already an existing and controversial budget proposal to sell 8 acres a year.  This risks some residents not having access to public green open space.

 

Cllr Meirion Jenkins (Con, Sutton Mere Green) Shadow Cabinet Member for Resources said:

 

“This is a council that has repeatedly shown itself to be incapable of looking after tax payers’ money. Despite several warnings from the auditors, it continues to mismanage its budget to such an extent that just two months into the new financial year, it is already failing to fully deliver nearly 60% of its own savings programme. Residents, who have been hit with a 5% increase to their council tax bill this year, will have had to make financial adjustments to their own spending but the Council, whose own budget has actually increased, lacks any such financial discipline. “

 

Cllr Debbie Clancy (Con, Longbridge and West Heath) the Leader of the Opposition Conservative Group on the City Council said:

 

“Under the financial stewardship of Cllr Ian Ward, this Council has continually failed to get a grip of its finances, with residents increasingly picking up the bill and paying the price through dirty streets and inadequate services. The latest plans, buried in a financial monitoring report, to sell off our city’s parks to compensate for this failure, are a slap in the face for the people of Birmingham. These parks belong to the city, not the city council and should not be used to cover the tracks for incompetent political leadership.”